If Garrett Wilson continues complaining, the Jets will trade him.
First call: Dec 18, 2024, 10:57 PM ET · Deadline: Sep 7, 2025, 1:00 PM ET · Historical archive
“Garrett better watch himself or hes getting traded.”OPEN THE ORIGINAL POST ↗
What we’re scoring
The source makes a trade conditional on Wilson conduct without specifying a triggering level or time window. Retain that uncertainty instead of treating retention as an unconditional loss.
The ruling
The triggering level of complaining and trade window are undefined. No arbitrary condition is invented.
View resolution evidence ↗Timeline & revisions
- Dec 18, 2024, 10:57 PM ET · originalIf Garrett Wilson continues complaining, the Jets will trade him.Source post ↗
- Dec 21, 2024, 7:34 PM ET · repeatIf Garrett Wilson continues complaining, the Jets will trade him.Source post ↗
Public review history (4)
- Sep 24, 2026, 5:41 PM ET · approve
The source makes a trade conditional on Wilson conduct without specifying a triggering level or time window. Retain that uncertainty instead of treating retention as an unconditional loss.
- Sep 24, 2026, 5:41 PM ET · verdict
The triggering level of complaining and trade window are undefined. No arbitrary condition is invented.
- Sep 24, 2026, 5:42 PM ET · repeat
Later repetition or revision of the same proposition; preserve wording and count the original once.
- Sep 24, 2026, 5:42 PM ET · review-note
The source makes a trade conditional on Wilson conduct without specifying a triggering level or time window. Retain that uncertainty instead of treating retention as an unconditional loss. Jev advisory and original-source context manually reviewed; source-specific review decisions retained in the batch audit.
Something doesn’t add up?
Send a factual correction with evidence. It goes to the review queue; it never changes the record automatically. Please leave out personal information.
