Denver will beat the Jets 40-3 in London on October 12, 2025.
First call: Oct 6, 2025, 2:47 PM ET · Deadline: Oct 12, 2025, 9:30 AM ET · Historical archive
“40-3 written all over it”OPEN THE ORIGINAL POST ↗
What we’re scoring
Earlier exact-score projection in Denver lead-up thread.
The ruling
The final score was Denver 13, New York 11, not 40-3.
View resolution evidence ↗Timeline & revisions
- Oct 6, 2025, 2:47 PM ET · originalDenver will beat the Jets 40-3 in London on October 12, 2025.Source post ↗
- Oct 7, 2025, 10:25 PM ET · repeatDenver will beat the Jets 40-3 in London on October 12, 2025.Source post ↗
- Oct 12, 2025, 9:25 AM ET · revisionDenver will beat the Jets by an exact 40-3 score in London on October 12, 2025.Source post ↗
Public review history (8)
- Sep 24, 2026, 3:21 PM ET · approve
Explicit numerical score retained as its own proposition; no invented spread from massacre.
- Sep 24, 2026, 3:21 PM ET · verdict
The final score was Denver 13, New York 11, not 40-3.
- Sep 24, 2026, 3:22 PM ET · review-note
Explicit numerical score retained as its own proposition; no invented spread from massacre. Jev advisory reviewed: Originals, chronology, primary evidence and Jev reviewed. Coaching dismissals correct; Quinnen ceiling and Jets first-pick incorrect. Denver winner correct and exact40-3incorrect. No duplicate scoring from links.
- Sep 24, 2026, 3:38 PM ET · verdict
Earlier exact-score projection in Denver lead-up thread.
- Sep 24, 2026, 3:38 PM ET · earliest-call-reconciled
Earlier exact-score projection in Denver lead-up thread.
- Sep 24, 2026, 3:38 PM ET · verdict
The final score was Denver 13, New York 11, not 40-3.
- Sep 24, 2026, 3:38 PM ET · repeat
Repeated numerical score.
- Sep 24, 2026, 3:39 PM ET · review-note
Earlier exact-score projection in Denver lead-up thread. Jev advisory reviewed: Denver named in full original, numerical40-3 explicit and repeated. Preserve a winner prediction and numerical score projection; remove added exact-emphasis from normalized wording. Reject Jev fidelity objection that numerical forecast cannot be recorded. Winner correct, stated score incorrect at13-11. Corrected carried-forward source timestamp in evidence; original isOctober6, notOctober12.
Something doesn’t add up?
Send a factual correction with evidence. It goes to the review queue; it never changes the record automatically. Please leave out personal information.
