The Jets should beat Denver in their 2024 game.
First call: May 27, 2024, 2:56 PM ET · Deadline: Sep 29, 2024, 7:59 PM ET · Historical archive
“after this game,”OPEN THE ORIGINAL POST ↗
What we’re scoring
The four games after San Francisco were Tennessee, New England, Denver and Minnesota. The relevant result was a 10-9 loss to Denver. No numerical margin is inferred from easily. The score applies to the explicit win direction; easily remains in the raw source as an unscored qualifier. The original easily qualifier is preserved in the raw source and this note as an unscored qualitative margin; this row grades only the explicit win direction.
The ruling
The four games after San Francisco were Tennessee, New England, Denver and Minnesota. The relevant result was a 10-9 loss to Denver. No numerical margin is inferred from easily.
View resolution evidence ↗Timeline & revisions
- May 27, 2024, 2:56 PM ET · originalThe Jets should beat Denver in their 2024 game.Source post ↗
- Sep 20, 2024, 6:23 PM ET · revisionThe Jets will beat Denver on September 29, 2024.Source post ↗
- Sep 21, 2024, 9:31 AM ET · revisionThe author expects the Jets to beat Denver on September 29, 2024.Source post ↗
- Sep 24, 2024, 8:42 PM ET · revisionThe author expects the Jets to beat Denver on September 29, 2024.Source post ↗
Public review history (12)
- Sep 24, 2026, 5:50 PM ET · approve
Celebration assertion in upcoming Broncos game thread; could-be-40 wording is possibility and not a separate exact total.
- Sep 24, 2026, 5:50 PM ET · verdict
Denver beat the Jets 10-9.
- Sep 24, 2026, 5:50 PM ET · repeat
Later explicit winner inside score projection.
- Sep 24, 2026, 5:52 PM ET · review-note
Celebration assertion in upcoming Broncos game thread; could-be-40 wording is possibility and not a separate exact total. Jev advisory and original-source context manually reviewed; source-specific review decisions retained in the batch audit.
- Sep 24, 2026, 5:58 PM ET · verdict
The author agrees with the quoted prediction of consecutive dominant performances after the Patriots win. This commits to a Jets win against Denver; the actual 10-9 loss contradicts it.
- Sep 24, 2026, 5:58 PM ET · earliest-call-reconciled
The author agrees with the quoted prediction of consecutive dominant performances after the Patriots win. This commits to a Jets win against Denver; the actual 10-9 loss contradicts it.
- Sep 24, 2026, 5:58 PM ET · verdict
Denver beat the Jets 10-9 on September 29, 2024.
- Sep 24, 2026, 5:59 PM ET · review-note
The author agrees with the quoted prediction of consecutive dominant performances after the Patriots win. This commits to a Jets win against Denver; the actual 10-9 loss contradicts it. Jev advisory and original-source context manually reviewed; source-specific review decisions retained in the batch audit.
- Sep 24, 2026, 6:26 PM ET · verdict
The four games after San Francisco were Tennessee, New England, Denver and Minnesota. The relevant result was a 10-9 loss to Denver. No numerical margin is inferred from easily. The score applies to the explicit win direction; easily remains in the raw source as an unscored qualifier. The original easily qualifier is preserved in the raw source and this note as an unscored qualitative margin; this row grades only the explicit win direction.
- Sep 24, 2026, 6:26 PM ET · earliest-call-reconciled
The four games after San Francisco were Tennessee, New England, Denver and Minnesota. The relevant result was a 10-9 loss to Denver. No numerical margin is inferred from easily. The score applies to the explicit win direction; easily remains in the raw source as an unscored qualifier. The original easily qualifier is preserved in the raw source and this note as an unscored qualitative margin; this row grades only the explicit win direction.
- Sep 24, 2026, 6:26 PM ET · verdict
The four games after San Francisco were Tennessee, New England, Denver and Minnesota. The relevant result was a 10-9 loss to Denver. No numerical margin is inferred from easily.
- Sep 24, 2026, 6:31 PM ET · review-note
The four games after San Francisco were Tennessee, New England, Denver and Minnesota. The relevant result was a 10-9 loss to Denver. No numerical margin is inferred from easily. The score applies to the explicit win direction; easily remains in the raw source as an unscored qualifier. The original easily qualifier is preserved in the raw source and this note as an unscored qualitative margin; this row grades only the explicit win direction. Jev advisory and original-source context manually reviewed; source-specific review decisions retained in the batch audit.
Something doesn’t add up?
Send a factual correction with evidence. It goes to the review queue; it never changes the record automatically. Please leave out personal information.
