UNOFFICIAL. UNHEDGED. UNREASONABLY INVESTED.ALL NFL TAKES ↗REAL RECEIPTS ✓REAL WAGERS ZEROCONVICTION ≠ RETURNS
← BACK TO THE RECEIPTS
JETS / game / 2024
✕ INCORRECT

The Jets will beat San Francisco in their 2024 opener.

First call: May 14, 2024, 9:59 AM ET · Deadline: Sep 10, 2024, 12:00 AM ET · Historical archive

THE ORIGINAL TAKE
“jets 27 niners 24”
OPEN THE ORIGINAL POST ↗

What we’re scoring

Earlier unambiguous score includes a Jets winner; Garrison Hurst retirement aside is humorous context, not a genuine eligibility condition.

The ruling

San Francisco beat the Jets 32-19.

View resolution evidence ↗

Timeline & revisions

  1. May 14, 2024, 9:59 AM ET · originalThe Jets will beat San Francisco in their 2024 opener.Source post ↗
  2. Aug 26, 2024, 10:38 AM ET · revisionThe Jets will beat San Francisco in the 2024 season opener.Source post ↗
  3. Aug 26, 2024, 11:19 AM ET · revisionThe Jets will win their opener against San Francisco.Source post ↗
  4. Aug 27, 2024, 9:46 PM ET · revisionThe Jets will beat San Francisco if Breece Hall gets 25 touches, but will lose if he gets fewer than 25.Source post ↗
  5. Aug 28, 2024, 1:37 PM ET · revisionThe Jets will beat San Francisco in the opener.Source post ↗
  6. Sep 3, 2024, 11:18 AM ET · revisionThe author expects the Jets to beat San Francisco on September 9, 2024.Source post ↗
  7. Sep 3, 2024, 4:48 PM ET · revisionIf Breece Hall gets 25 touches, the Jets will beat San Francisco on September 9, 2024.Source post ↗
  8. Sep 9, 2024, 7:49 AM ET · revisionThe author expects the Jets to beat San Francisco on September 9, 2024.Source post ↗
Public review history (16)
  1. Sep 24, 2026, 6:01 PM ET · approve

    Author explicitly distinguishes predicting a winner from confidence sufficient to bet; preserve modest expectation.

  2. Sep 24, 2026, 6:01 PM ET · verdict

    San Francisco beat the Jets 32-19.

  3. Sep 24, 2026, 6:01 PM ET · repeat

    Later exact score also repeats the Jets winner.

  4. Sep 24, 2026, 6:01 PM ET · revision

    Later conditional revision, preserving 25-touch premise; not an extra result or an unconditional earlier call.

  5. Sep 24, 2026, 6:05 PM ET · review-note

    Author explicitly distinguishes predicting a winner from confidence sufficient to bet; preserve modest expectation. Jev advisory and original-source context manually reviewed; source-specific review decisions retained in the batch audit.

  6. Sep 24, 2026, 6:09 PM ET · verdict

    Earlier explicit opener winner restores the same key as the adjacent cohort.

  7. Sep 24, 2026, 6:09 PM ET · earliest-call-reconciled

    Earlier explicit opener winner restores the same key as the adjacent cohort.

  8. Sep 24, 2026, 6:09 PM ET · verdict

    San Francisco beat the Jets 32-19 on September 9, 2024.

  9. Sep 24, 2026, 6:09 PM ET · revision

    Winner expectation repeated while imagining reactions afterward.

  10. Sep 24, 2026, 6:09 PM ET · revision

    Later conditional reversal linked to the same winner key. Hall had 21 touches and Jetslost, so this revision was satisfied, without adding a second scored win. The 20 carry/5 catch allocation is a recommended formula, not a separate forecast.

  11. Sep 24, 2026, 6:09 PM ET · revision

    Later winner and score reaffirmation.

  12. Sep 24, 2026, 6:10 PM ET · review-note

    Earlier explicit opener winner restores the same key as the adjacent cohort. Jev advisory and original-source context manually reviewed; source-specific review decisions retained in the batch audit.

  13. Sep 24, 2026, 6:37 PM ET · verdict

    Earlier unambiguous score includes a Jets winner; Garrison Hurst retirement aside is humorous context, not a genuine eligibility condition.

  14. Sep 24, 2026, 6:37 PM ET · earliest-call-reconciled

    Earlier unambiguous score includes a Jets winner; Garrison Hurst retirement aside is humorous context, not a genuine eligibility condition.

  15. Sep 24, 2026, 6:37 PM ET · verdict

    San Francisco beat the Jets 32-19.

  16. Sep 24, 2026, 6:40 PM ET · review-note

    Earlier unambiguous score includes a Jets winner; Garrison Hurst retirement aside is humorous context, not a genuine eligibility condition. Jev advisory and original-source context manually reviewed; source-specific review decisions retained in the batch audit.

THROW THE CHALLENGE FLAG

Something doesn’t add up?

Send a factual correction with evidence. It goes to the review queue; it never changes the record automatically. Please leave out personal information.