If C.J. Mosley misses the September 19, 2024 Patriots game, the Jets run defense will be fine.
First call: Sep 15, 2024, 7:48 PM ET · Deadline: Sep 19, 2024, 8:15 PM ET · Historical archive
“Our run D is fine as long as Mosely is out.”OPEN THE ORIGINAL POST ↗
What we’re scoring
The quoted post discusses stopping the Patriots run game in the upcoming game, confirming a prospective condition. Fine has no defined efficiency or yardage criterion; the later run-a-lick version remains a linked revision, not the wording of this original.
The ruling
Mosley missed the Patriots game. The original does not define when the run defense counts as fine, so the qualitative conditional result remains unresolved.
View resolution evidence ↗Timeline & revisions
- Sep 15, 2024, 7:48 PM ET · originalIf C.J. Mosley misses the September 19, 2024 Patriots game, the Jets run defense will be fine.Source post ↗
- Sep 15, 2024, 10:36 PM ET · revisionIf C.J. Mosley misses the Patriots game, New England will not run effectively against the Jets.Source post ↗
- Sep 17, 2024, 11:50 AM ET · revisionIf C.J. Mosley misses the Patriots game, New England will not run effectively against the Jets.Source post ↗
Public review history (5)
- Sep 24, 2026, 5:56 PM ET · approve
The quoted post discusses stopping the Patriots run game in the upcoming game, confirming a prospective condition. Fine has no defined efficiency or yardage criterion; the later run-a-lick version remains a linked revision, not the wording of this original.
- Sep 24, 2026, 5:56 PM ET · verdict
Mosley missed the Patriots game. The original does not define when the run defense counts as fine, so the qualitative conditional result remains unresolved.
- Sep 24, 2026, 5:57 PM ET · revision
Later clearer wording of the same conditional run-defense forecast. Preserve not running a lick as a qualitative claim, not literal zero yards.
- Sep 24, 2026, 5:57 PM ET · revision
Later repetition or revision of the same proposition; retain its wording and count the original once.
- Sep 24, 2026, 5:59 PM ET · review-note
The quoted post discusses stopping the Patriots run game in the upcoming game, confirming a prospective condition. Fine has no defined efficiency or yardage criterion; the later run-a-lick version remains a linked revision, not the wording of this original. Jev advisory and original-source context manually reviewed; source-specific review decisions retained in the batch audit.
Something doesn’t add up?
Send a factual correction with evidence. It goes to the review queue; it never changes the record automatically. Please leave out personal information.