If Justin Fields plays all 17 games in 2025, he will rush for over 1,000 yards.
First call: May 27, 2025, 1:12 PM ET · Deadline: Jan 5, 2026, 12:00 AM ET · Historical archive
“He will have over 1,000 yards rushing,”OPEN THE ORIGINAL POST ↗
What we’re scoring
The immediately preceding question supplies the all-17-games condition. Earlier conditional quantity projection replaces later unconditional revision for this same statistic.
The ruling
Fields started nine games, was replaced in Week 12, missed Weeks 13-15 with a knee injury and went on injured reserve before Week 17. He did not play all 17 games, so the explicit full-season condition failed.
View resolution evidence ↗Timeline & revisions
- May 27, 2025, 1:12 PM ET · originalIf Justin Fields plays all 17 games in 2025, he will rush for over 1,000 yards.Source post ↗
- Aug 9, 2025, 4:31 PM ET · revisionJustin Fields will rush for 830 yards in the 2025 regular season.Source post ↗
Public review history (7)
- Sep 24, 2026, 4:44 PM ET · approve
Explicit separate numerical season statistic. The source gives no health or full-season-starting condition.
- Sep 24, 2026, 4:44 PM ET · verdict
Fields finished with 383 rushing yards.
- Sep 24, 2026, 4:48 PM ET · review-note
Explicit separate numerical season statistic. The source gives no health or full-season-starting condition. Jev advisory and original-source context manually reviewed; source-specific review decisions retained in the batch audit.
- Sep 24, 2026, 5:18 PM ET · verdict
The immediately preceding question supplies the all-17-games condition. Earlier conditional quantity projection replaces later unconditional revision for this same statistic.
- Sep 24, 2026, 5:18 PM ET · earliest-call-reconciled
The immediately preceding question supplies the all-17-games condition. Earlier conditional quantity projection replaces later unconditional revision for this same statistic.
- Sep 24, 2026, 5:18 PM ET · verdict
Fields started nine games, was replaced in Week 12, missed Weeks 13-15 with a knee injury and went on injured reserve before Week 17. He did not play all 17 games, so the explicit full-season condition failed.
- Sep 24, 2026, 5:19 PM ET · review-note
The immediately preceding question supplies the all-17-games condition. Earlier conditional quantity projection replaces later unconditional revision for this same statistic. Jev advisory and original-source context manually reviewed; source-specific review decisions retained in the batch audit.
Something doesn’t add up?
Send a factual correction with evidence. It goes to the review queue; it never changes the record automatically. Please leave out personal information.